Earning trust, asserting vision, and leading design to a seat at the table
THE METROPOLITAN OPERA
tl;dr
The Met Opera brought us on for a tightly scoped replatform, skeptical of our design capabilities and resistant to change. I led discovery and design strategy, navigating legacy expectations, shifting internal perceptions, and coaching my team to deliver high-impact work within strict constraints. By staying highly visible, facilitating user research, and managing team transitions seamlessly, I helped reposition our design practice as a trusted partner inside a historically design-resistant account.
How might we advance design in a space resistant to change?
The Challenge
The Met Opera brought us on to replatform their legacy site to a modern foundation. The scope was narrow: preserve visuals, minimize UX changes. Historically, The Met engaged outside design agencies, viewing our strength as engineering only. This was our first chance to change that narrative.
I co-led the pitch, reframed our capabilities, and helped secure the work. The brief left little room for change, but I saw an opportunity to advance design—carefully, strategically, and with staying power.
The Situation
Perception of our design practice was limited. I joined as Associate Director of Design and the face of our design expertise. Early on, a stakeholder asked if I was “at the top” of our design org—prompting me to push for a formal title change internally, so that we reinforced our belief in design’s presence at the table.
I led discovery with our VP of Strategy and embedded two designers from my team into the work. We focused on surfacing user pain points, aligning business goals, and identifying high-leverage improvements that respected the brand while supporting usability.
Tools
Figma
Miro
UserTesting.com
ChatGPT Deep Research
Key Contributions
Ideation
Workshop Facilitation
User Testing
Team Oversight
Creative Leadership
Client & Stakeholder Management
My Role & Approach
I stepped in as the de facto head of design—before my title caught up. When a lead stakeholder at The Met asked, “Are you the top of your design org?” I knew that perception mattered. I advocated internally for a formal title change to signal the weight of our commitment and the seriousness of our presence.
I co-led discovery, partnering with our VP of Strategy to build a cross-disciplinary approach that covered user needs, content strategy, business goals, and sector benchmarks. I also embedded two of my designers into the work—not just as contributors, but as owners—and supported them actively through feedback, escalation, and narrative shaping.
I knew this client would be exacting. So I broke down success in stages, coached the team on what excellence looked like within constraint, and ensured that creative ambition was channeled toward strategic outcomes. I wasn’t asking them to shrink their vision—I was helping them aim it.
When things got hard—and they did—I shielded the team, aligned leadership, and stayed present as the connective tissue between client and internal teams. This was high-stakes work. We weren’t just designing screens—we were reshaping the perception of our design org from the inside out.
Key Actions
Led with Presence, Not Ego: I remained visible throughout, opening every presentation and reinforcing our rationale before handing the floor to the designers. This gave the client consistent leadership and gave my team protected space to lead without being left exposed.
Redefined Success for the Moment: I helped the team distinguish between ideal and essential. The Met needed to know we could respect their brand and improve usability. That meant being selective, not timid.
I lead workshops to clarify project goals and design constraints, and opened the room to broader thinking by taking the focus away from the Met and to the broader landscape. Pictured here: a workshop on competitor experiences.
Anticipated and Solved for Team Transitions: When a senior designer chose to leave mid-project, I supported her decision and quietly solved the staffing gap through my network—bringing in a successor before the handoff began. Continuity mattered, and we didn’t miss a beat.
Broke Logjams with Research: When design conversations reached gridlock, I proposed user testing to ground the conversation in evidence. I wrote and facilitated the plan, and used the synthesis to shift the conversation from opinion to opportunity.
Along the way, I leveraged opportunities within the project to expose my team to new kinds of work. Here, we engaged in qual/quant user testing and synthesizing into themes.
Outcomes
Momentum, Maintained: The design team continues to deliver under a sprint framework I developed, balancing deep work with client-facing moments. Our quality and cadence are deliberate.
Perception Shifted: A client once hesitant to include us in design now engages regularly, with feedback passed directly to our CEO. The most telling sign of progress? They keep talking to us—constructively, collaboratively, and consistently.
Team Strengthened: I paired designers with complementary skill sets, allowing them to support and stretch each other. I’ve remained the escalation path, ensuring the creative vision stays intact—even when the path to execution gets messy.
Walking the line between optimization and preservation required embracing the brand that existed — and finding ways to make it work better.
“I would not have tried half as hard to make this work if you hadn’t pushed me. I always knew you were in the room if I needed it.”
This project demanded a different kind of leadership—less about the volume of change, more about the shape of it. I had to know when to push, when to wait, and how to hold space for something bigger than a single outcome: a strategic reintroduction of our design practice inside a legacy institution.
I was transparent with my team from the beginning: this wouldn’t be the most creatively open project—but it would be one of the most meaningful. And we treated every inch of ground we gained as a foundation for more.